Fw: Re: Best Tube Transceiver? Clarifications

[Kees Talen]

Ahhh, West Central Florida ...That's the "Lightning Belt" area where they
perform numerous scientific lightning strike tests by propelling wires
into the clouds. Good luck on your search and I can certainly see why you
want EMP protection.

73 Kees K5BCQ

--------- Forwarded message ----------
From: edoc <kd4e at ARRL.NET>
To: BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 09:07:10 -0500
Subject: Re: Best Tube Transceiver?  Clarifications
Message-ID: <4066DC0E.1030406 at arrl.net>
References: <40663E38.3000903 at arrl.net> <406644C3.1040901 at core.com>
        <40664315.30100 at arrl.net> <40665A54.665258A8 at bendcable.com>

>>I need something free of *any* solid state devices whatsoever.
>>
> Neil McKie wrote:
>   Meaning no 1N34 diodes in the detector ??

I really appreciate the many suggestions so far -- here is
some discussion of my reasons and preferences to further
clarify:

I am no "suvivalist" but do live in a high lightning area,
thus EMP is an issue.  Plus I'd just like to own a working
all-tube/no-semiconductor rig.

I like to have something available should all my lightning/
EMP protection systems fail and a surge disable my solid
state gear.  (As we know, should a serious surge get into
the radio room most semiconductor devices in the room, even
disconnected from antenna, power, and shared ground, will
likely fail.  I believe that a tube rig will not.)

I have read the EMP-protection assertions on this site
http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/Falls/1984/newfact.htm
and will see about getting the report, but I'd like the
extra margin of error that a no-semiconductor rig offers.

I do no know how resilient IN34's are vs a tube device in
the same application.

A receiver-transmitter combo is also an option, even a
military tx-rx combo (? and a R-392) or a transceiver are
worthy of consideration, but they tend to be pricey

The Collins suggestions are fine but way way way outside
of the budget!  (Note: I stipulated something equivalent
to the value of my S-85, SX-99, and R46.  I'd have to
sell my car to afford Collins!)

I am mostly interested in SSB performance, CW tends to always
be an option for every rig, though it is not my preferred mode.

--
Thanks! & 73, doc kd4e
West Central Florida
Op. Atlas, Drake, Hallicrafters, TenTec ...
p.s. Linux-incompatible hardware is defective!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

-----------------------------------------------------------
This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
-----------------------------------------------------------

Subscription control -
http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.asp?list=BOATANCHORS
To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
Archives - http://interactive.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html

-----------------------------------------------------------
This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
-----------------------------------------------------------

Subscription control - http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.asp?list=BOATANCHORS
To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
Archives - http://interactive.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html