maybe baxter is on the right path was: ARRL Ruins the AM, CW and DIGITAL bands.

[peter A markavage]

Who would put together this alternative organization to replace the ARRL
and how would they be funded to do the things the ARRL does currently or
has done in the past? How many to hold back renewal ( 50, 100, 1000
members).  Less revenue coming in most likely would result in the ARRL
being less able to effectively support the Amateur Radio Service issues
that beat constantly at our door.

Pete, wa2cwa

On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 17:52:08 -0500 WSHU Engineering <paull at WSHU.ORG>
writes:
> I get just as annoyed with K1MAN's thinly disguised broadcast efforts
> as
> everyone else BUT... maybe we do need an alternative to the ARRL.
> They may
> not listen to complaints or answer your e-mails but if enough of us
> start
> with holding our renewals it WILL get their attention.
>
> Paul A. Litwinovich
> Director of Engineering
> WSHU AM & FM, WSUF-FM
> FCC License  PG-GB 039245
> "RF IS GOOD FOR YOU"
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subscription control -
> http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.asp?list=BOATANCHORS
> To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
> Archives - http://interactive.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html
>
>

-----------------------------------------------------------
This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
-----------------------------------------------------------

Subscription control - http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.asp?list=BOATANCHORS
To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
Archives - http://interactive.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html