Linear Question
john
johnmb at NC.RR.COM
Wed Apr 28 06:44:21 EDT 2010
The AL80A/B is a nicer amp, with a rugged transmitting tube. I'd go for it
John k5mo
At 05:07 AM 4/28/2010, Nigel Holmes wrote:
>1. The extra 300 watts won't be noticeable by the receiver in practice. It
>will increase your power bill in direct proportion.
>
>2. One big glass tube with an orange anode looks better than four medium
>glass bottles with cherry anodes.
>
>3. Need less spares inventory. Easier to bias a single tube stage. More
>reliable with a single bottle.
>
>Easy for me to comment having seen neither amp, much less used them...
>
>The 572B/T160L is a beefed up 811A - more massive anode, higher plate
>voltage rating. A good choice for replacing 811A in amps originally rated
>at 200W PEP per 811A if you wanted to keep the steam up for long periods.
>
>Whatever you choose avoid "cheap" spare tubes. See
>http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/1165 etc for comment on modern 572B's
>
>73 Nigel VK3DZ
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Boat Anchor Owners and Collectors List
>[mailto:BOATANCHORS at LISTS.TEMPE.GOV] On Behalf Of Vic Gagliano
>Sent: Wednesday, 28 April 2010 6:33 PM
>To: BOATANCHORS at LISTS.TEMPE.GOV
>Subject: [BOATANCHORS-TEMPE] Linear Question
>
>Hello Anchorites:
>
>Just wanted to toss this question out there abt the Ameritron amps 80B and
>the 572.
>
>With all things being equal, anybody have any experience with either of them?
>
>Seems like the 80B is 1Kw with a 3-500 tube in it and for a couple of
>hundred more
>
>you get the 1300 watt 572 with 4 each 572's.
>
>Am I correct in assuming the 572's are 811's on steroids pushed a little
>harder?
>
>Is it worth the extra money for the 300 watt difference between the two,
>or what?
>
>
>
>Thanks guys,
>
>
>
>Vic WA2ARQ
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>
>Subscription control -
>http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.aspx?list=BOATANCHORS
>To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTS.TEMPE.GOV
>Archives - http://lists.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html
>Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
>
>The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and
>may contain legally privileged or copyright material. It is intended
>only for
>the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this
>email, you are not permitted to disseminate, distribute or copy this email or
>any attachments. If you have received this message in error, please
>notify the
>sender immediately and delete this email from your system. The ABC does not
>represent or warrant that this transmission is secure or virus free. Before
>opening any attachment you should check for viruses. The ABC's liability is
>limited to resupplying any email and attachments.
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>
>Subscription control -
>http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.aspx?list=BOATANCHORS
>To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTS.TEMPE.GOV
>Archives - http://lists.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html
-----------------------------------------------------------
This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
-----------------------------------------------------------
Subscription control - http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.aspx?list=BOATANCHORS
To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTS.TEMPE.GOV
Archives - http://lists.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html
More information about the Boatanchors
mailing list