[cisco-bba] radius accounting

[Dennis Peng]

Martin [nytral at spamcop.net] wrote:
> Isn't 12.3(1a)B more recent than 12.2?

Yes.

> radius-server attribute doesn't list 52/53 as valid.

There is no CLI for the Giga attributes, so if you are in
configuration mode and do a "radius-server attribute ?", those
attributes won't show up.

"show radius table attributes | inc Giga" should return something
though.

And 12.3(2)T has a stopper bug with some tunnel sessions not 
> coming up, so it's a no go (even though I noticed a much lower cpu 
> utilization with pxf, which is a good hint at future performance 
> improvements).

Do you have more details about that (case number)?

Dennis

> Martin
> 
> On Thursday 16 October 2003 13:25, Dennis Peng wrote:
> > The Giga attributes are supported in 12.2(4)B or 12.2(13)T or
> > later. Other then periodic accounting, there really is no other way
> > right now to force interim updates.
> >
> > Dennis
> >
> > Martin [nytral at spamcop.net] wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > to followup on the july thread regarding radius accounting limitations
> > > (4GB), I read that acct-input-gigawords is supported in recent IOS. We
> > > are running 12.3(1a)B, which is the most recent/stable to run on
> > > 7204/NSE1. And I can't find anything about this attribute.
> > > Did anyone find a way to deal with accounting without disconnecting
> > > users? Intermediate records may help but are quite tricky to deal with
> > > accross billing periods.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > Martin
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-bba mailing list
> > > cisco-bba at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-bba mailing list
> cisco-bba at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba