[cisco-nas] isdn map command and pots dial-peer
Eric Knudson
ericknudson at gmail.com
Sun Dec 19 03:01:13 EST 2004
Erick,
I'm under the impression that dial-peer selection and modifying
plan/type (via isdn map command) take place in wildly different
sections of IOS, and would be really surprised if that's actually
causing the problem. Could we get some debug voip ccapi output for the
two situations, maybe even the result from a 'show dialplan number
XXXXX' with/without the isdn map command in place?
Regards,
Eric
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 17:59:05 -0800 (PST), Erick B. <erickbe at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been trying to find out if there is an
> interaction or effect isdn map command under D channel
> has on dial-peer operations.
>
> We have a situation where we need to change the
> numbering plan/type on a 800 # and we have a pots
> dial-peer with a 1800........ destination pattern and
> it works for all 800 #s except the 800 # in the isdn
> map statement.
>
> When we call the 800 # that matches the isdn map, the
> 800 dial peer is not used and it goes to the other LD
> dial peer which puts a 1010 prefix code on calls and
> the call fails.
>
> >From looking at debugs, it appears to try to use the
> 800 dial peer but skips on to the other LD dial peer
> w/1010 prefix.
>
> Any idea on why isdn map command effects dial-peer
> operation? We have a TAC case on this for a few
> weeks.
> This is 7206 with 12.3(8)T5. The same problem happened
> on earlier IOS. We upgraded a few weeks ago to see if
> it would help or not.
>
> Were using a translation rule now but I would like to
> figure out whats up the isdn map command and dial
> peer.
>
> Thanks in advance, Erick
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> All your favorites on one personal page – Try My Yahoo!
> http://my.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nas mailing list
> cisco-nas at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas
>
More information about the cisco-nas
mailing list