[nsp] Sub interfaces Question

[Marcus Keane]

Johnny, this should be no problem. There are some caveats to using
multipoint interfaces with some IGPs such as OSPF.
Marcus.

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of John F. Chavez
Sent: Wednesday, 29 October 2003 06:53
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [nsp] Sub interfaces Question

Hello we are acquiring another companies Frame Relay clients.  We setup
our frame clients on point-to-point sub interfaces of the main
frame-relay interface.  The company we are acquiring uses frame-relay
maps and we are trying to make this move as transparent to the customers
as possible.

My question is; Can we setup frame relay maps on a multipoint sub
interface?

Example:
Main Interface with other point-to-point subs configured.
interface Serial4/4:0
 no ip address
 encapsulation frame-relay IETF
 ip route-cache policy
 no fair-queue
 frame-relay lmi-type ansi

New Sub with frame-relay map configured:
interface Serial4/4:0.25 multipoint
 ip address 192.168.253.1 255.255.255.0
 frame-relay map ip 192.168.253.20 60
 frame-relay map ip 192.168.253.25 65

Notice the link addresses are setup on the same /24 address space with
the gateway address or ISP end of the link set to 192.168.253.1.

Has anyone tried this before or does anyone know if this is possible?
Any help is appreciated.


Johnny F. Chavez               | Network Operations Manager, AZ
mailto:jchavez at theriver.com    | The River Internet Access Co.
http://www.theriver.com/       | 520-745-1009 Ext. 101


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/