[nsp] Experiences with SUP2/MSFC2 & OSM-1OC48-POS-SS linecard ?

[Alex Nguyen]

Hi,

It there any performance impact with features (ACL, QoS, Netflow,
etc) activated ?

Thanks.

A.
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Mohacsi Janos wrote:

MJ> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 11:27:27 +0200 (CEST)
MJ> From: Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi at niif.hu>
MJ> To: Patrick Coppinger <pcoppinger at corp.earthlink.net>
MJ> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
MJ> Subject: Re: [nsp] Experiences with SUP2/MSFC2 & OSM-1OC48-POS-SS
MJ>     linecard ?
MJ> 
MJ> Hello,
MJ> 	We are using OC48 OSM cards in our backbone for more than 3 years
MJ> without much problem. We can load up to 2.4 Gbit/s. It is very reliable
MJ> comparing the circuit reliability. We are also using MPLS on it. One major
MJ> drawback is, that they can work only as a Layer3 endpoint.
MJ> 
MJ> Best Regards,
MJ> 
MJ> 
MJ> Janos Mohacsi
MJ> Network Engineer, Research Associate
MJ> NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
MJ> Key 00F9AF98: 8645 1312 D249 471B DBAE  21A2 9F52 0D1F 00F9 AF98
MJ> 
MJ> On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Patrick Coppinger wrote:
MJ> 
MJ> >
MJ> > I was hoping someone here can share their experiences with OC48 OSM cards.
MJ> > What I'm mostly looking for is thoughts on reliability and throughput
MJ> > performance in production environments.
MJ> >
MJ> > Thanks
MJ> >
MJ> >
MJ> > Patrick Coppinger
MJ> > Network Engineer, CCNP
MJ> > Earthlink, Inc
MJ> > (404) 748-7454 x22454 desk
MJ> > (678) 592-7041 cell
MJ> > pcoppinger at corp.earthlink.net
MJ> >
MJ> >
MJ> >
MJ> > _______________________________________________
MJ> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
MJ> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
MJ> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
MJ> >
MJ> _______________________________________________
MJ> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
MJ> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
MJ> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
MJ>