[nsp] Cisco Cat3750 IPv6

[Zach Wilkinson]

How about Extreme Summit? Never used them but the spec looks right.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <sthaug at nethelp.no>
To: <sbr at infonet.ee>
Cc: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [nsp] Cisco Cat3750 IPv6


> > It it ok that you do not have counters (almost) on Cat3550
> > switches, and it is well documented. It is ok for this box,
> > very cheap, reliable and fast.
> > 
> > And try not to compare L3 switch with ROUTER. ;)
> 
> "L3 switch" is a marketing term. If you use a 3550 to do forwarding
> based on IP addresses you are by definition using it as a router, and
> comparing it to other routers is fair game.
> 
> As a pure Ethernet-Ethernet router I think the 3550 gives reasonable
> value for the money you pay. Is it worth paying considerably more to
> get working SVI counters? I guess that depends on your needs.
> 
> Has anybody looked at the L3 offerings from for instance HP? The
> Procurve 2600 series has static routing (even more limited then the
> 3550: Only static routes), but the price is also considerably better.
> 
> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>