[nsp] CAT 3750 EMI

[Deepak Jain]

At layer 3?

We have plenty of problems on the optical interfaces and TAC has not 
been able to explain why. Strangely enough, the MORE features we turn 
on, the better they are. The more caching we turn off, the better things 
  are.

We think its a software maturity issue mostly.

DJ

Rod Oliver wrote:

> Can you please describe your experiences that lead you to this? My colleague
> was unable to get a 3750 (don;'t know what software) to get significant
> packet drops using a Smartbits and lots of GEs.
> 
> Rod
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>>[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Deepak Jain
>>Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 11:41 PM
>>To: szilard.matyas at enternet.hu
>>Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>Subject: Re: [nsp] CAT 3750 EMI
>>
>>
>>
>>I would stay away from them if you want to do anything at close to wire
>>speed based on our current experience.
>>
>>DJ
>>
>>szilard.matyas at enternet.hu wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi all,
>>>
>>>If anybody has good/bad experiences with cat3750 with EMI
>>
>>software, please write me!
>>
>>>Thanks Everybody's response in advance!
>>>
>>>regards
>>>szicsu
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>
>>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>