[c-nsp] Sup2 12.2(18)SXD ip load-sharing

[Bruce Pinsky]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

John Jackson wrote:
| Here is my situation.  I have customers that NAT that also have multiple t1
| to our Flex-Wan2 card.  Since they NAT I don't think per destination is a
| good answer however when I try to configure per-packet I get:
|

I would think the opposite.  I would want to see flows to a destination go
out and come back in the same interface.  If you alternate between outbound
interfaces, seems like you run a high risk of breaking connections due to
lack of NAT state.

| Router(config-if)#ip load-sharing ?
|   per-destination  Deterministic distribution
|   <cr>
|
| What is the difference between with and without per-dest in the command?  Is
| without per-destination the same as per-packet?  Is there another way other
| then MLPPP to do this?
|

I think that since the "per-packet" keyword is not present, you only have
per-destination.

|
| In the past these customers the customers connected to vips in 7500's and we
| had the per-packet option.  We would like to keep the same method in place
| for Flex-wan2 cards.
|
- --
=========
bep

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFBXaU8E1XcgMgrtyYRAlKFAKD3CxQJgnHatGPJ39463T0+PL4PhgCeJN0J
aDv4EwcZ7UWC7lhL+AM/dGE=
=//pc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----