[c-nsp] Netflow reported utilization vs actual

Cheung, Rick Rick.Cheung at nextelpartners.com
Fri Sep 10 12:15:32 EDT 2004


	Hi, folks. Should the reported utilization from netflow flows be the
actual utilization on the interface? I have a 2620 exporting to Fedora
running flow-tools and CUGrapher, yet I notice that the aggregate
utilization reported is lower than reported from MRTG via SNMP. All up
interfaces excluding the Lo0 have been enabled for netflow...

	Any ideas?



Rick Cheung



This message, including any attachments, contains confidential information intended for a specific
individual and purpose and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies. 
You are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking 
of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.

WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email
and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The sender accepts no liability for any damage 
caused by any virus transmitted by this email. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed 
to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors 
or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list