[c-nsp] Cat 6500 and counters
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Thu Apr 28 02:36:09 EDT 2005
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 05:05:29PM -0700, Tim Stevenson wrote:
> There is no IPv6 NF support, it is on the roadmap. It requires NFv9, which
> is not supported today. Both sup2 & sup720 support v5 NF for IPv4 unicast.
Thanks for this clarification. Can you give a (rough) timeline for NFv9?
We're providing "production" IPv6 services today, and one of our problems
is that we already see IPv6 DoS attachs - and without NFv9, it's very
difficult to quickly detect and trace them.
> But as mentioned elsewhere, the most bang for the buck is no doubt sup720
> w/PFC3B, vs. sup2.
I'm a bit confused about this "PFC3B" and "DFC" business.
We have a number of existing cat6k line cards around (running right now
in a cat6k with Sup1A, and no MSFC), things like WS-X6408A-GBIC and
WS-X6348-RJ-45.
Basically we want to re-use them, with the Sup720, to provide L3 routing
on the box now. Am I correct in assuming that they will "just work", but
not have any distributed forwarding (that's what the DFC3 is needed for)?
What does the PFC* do, and does it has to match certain hardware levels /
feature card levels on the line cards?
thanks,
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list