[c-nsp] PPP Multilink

[noc ops]

in-line:


Ozgur Guler wrote:
> The point here is, 
> CEF LB works great if you have multiple links, even with voice.
------
interesting, we've had horrible performance due to packet-out-of-order
on our 2xt1s (2621) w/ cef per-packet enabled.

> So why add a multilink overhead and run buggy 'cef over multilink' 
---------------
which ios in particular as far as bug(s) goes? has anyone done analysis
on CPU usage for CEF per-packet vs CEF MLPPP?


regards,
/virendra


> 
> Ozgur
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tim Franklin
> Sent: 01 Aralık 2005 Perşembe 17:29
> To: aptgetd at gmail.com; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [c-nsp] PPP Multilink
> 
> 
>>Why would you want to disable cef on mlppp bundle? Can't 
>>remember where
>>I saw this reference but thought that I run this by the group for
>>confirmation.
> 
> 
> You've possibly seen the discussion of MLPPP vs CEF load-balancing as the
> two ways of using multiple links between the same pair of routers.  MLPPP is
> inherently not CEF load-balancing, but that's not the same thing as turning
> off CEF on the multilink interface.
> 
> Regards,
> Tim.
>