[c-nsp] WS-X6148-GE-TX limitation

[morph]

Thanks all

I´m goingo to talk with Cisco to change the modules :(
or looking for a solution... layer 3 balancing is not an option :)


Everett Dowd wrote:

>I got bit by that same bug on our 6500's. It is a limit of the card itself
>and is documented (you really have to look for it though)... This card is
>based on an 8:1 oversubscription and you can actually rob bandwidth from the
>other seven ports is one is pushing packets at a high rate. 
>
>Of course you can always move to the 6748, and the SUP 720 if you really
>want throughput. We moved back to the 16 port gig cards so we could up the
>bandwidth on the 6500.  
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of morph
>Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 12:48 PM
>To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>Subject: [c-nsp] WS-X6148-GE-TX limitation
>
>Hi all :)
>
>I have several routers (7600 family) with this module.
>I can see there is a limitation as shown in 
>http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/hw/routers/ps368/products_confi
>guration_guide_chapter09186a0080160eb8.html
>
>"The WS-X6148-GE-TX and WS-X6148V-GE-TX switching modules do not support 
>more than
>1 Gbps of traffic per EtherChannel."
>
>When I bought this equipment in Cisco, they told us nothing about this 
>limitation (they know that we need etherchannels supporting more than 
>2-3 Gb)
>
>Is it at last a problem with the switch fabric or more related to the 
>IOS that support it?
>
>Cheers
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
>
>  
>