[c-nsp] 6500/7600 with Sup720 opinion

[Alastair Pooley]

Hi

Successfully used the 3BXL for peering routers in 6500's. Our busiest one
has 146 peers with a BGP table of 150,000 routes - due to a mixture of
peering and a transit feed. We've had no problems with it in this role - it
shifts data at an excellent rate. We run a full MPLS network and we also use
the 3BXL's as P routers with no issues. Not running QoS or uRPF on them. As
for PPS - I've not measured it, our's shift around 1-2 Gbps max so they are
slightly underused but we wanted the MPLS functionality.

Regards
Alastair


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Arie Vayner" <ariev at netvision.net.il>
To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 12:21 PM
Subject: [c-nsp] 6500/7600 with Sup720 opinion


> Hi
>
> Does anyone use the 6500/7600 platform with Sup720 (Sup3BXL/Sup3B)?
> Any experience with this platform as a peering router? Any known
> limitations? MPLS? PPS rates? QoS? uRPF?
> Also, does anyone use this platform with any 10Gig interfaces?
>
> Thanks
>
> Arie Vayner
> CCIE #12198
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________