[c-nsp] 2811 router doesn't recognize T-1 WICs?
MADMAN
david.madland at qwest.com
Wed Jan 26 10:14:48 EST 2005
Concerning the WIC-1DSU-T1-V2 we have been ecperiencing many problems
and have a TAC case opened. So far we have identifed twi issues that
Cisco has bugs id's assigned to.
- WIC runs for 2 hours, 17 minutes then goes down
- High number of T1 errors seen with V2 card, no errors seen on same
line with V1 card
These are Cisco internal bugs so I can't provide a bug ID. Though
these specific cases may not reflect your experiences me thinks the V2
has multiple issues.
Dave
Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Open a case with the Cisco TAC. Since your 2811 is probably pretty new,
> you shouldn't even need a service contract (yet). They'll send you replacement
> WICs and test to figure out why your current ones failed.
>
> So far, with the new 2811s, I have seen an instance where one customer bought
> a mix of six 2811 and 2821 routers, and six WIC-1DSU-T1-V2s, only to find
> that three out of the six V2 WICs DID NOT WORK. The broken three ONLY worked
> in slot 0, and often times the T1s did not work properly even in that instance
> (it would go down and a reload was the only way to bring it back up).
>
> The good three WICs worked fine, in any slot. The kicker is that the six
> WICs had _SEQUENTIAL_ serial numbers, so for half of them to be "bad" in the
> 2811s was definitely not expected. They seemed to work fine in 3600 and
> other older routers.
>
> Same customer, same routers, they also had a problem with a 2811 that
> is even more worrisome. One 2811, on a particular T1, would not stay
> up, "Line protocol is down", unless you set hdlc keepalive to 13 or something
> else odd. Plug in a 2500 with external CSU or 2600 with a WIC and the T1
> works just fine with completely default settings. Ironically, other
> 2811s work fine at this location with default settings. All 2811s had
> the same IOS images (not that there is much choice for these new boxes)
>
> Yep, there are strange issues with these new boxes. Given Cisco's marketing
> push, I would imagine most early adopters are using them primarily in
> voice applications and not data T1s. Perhaps they were better debugged there.
>
> All I have left is to say "Way to go Cisco!!" for the broken T1 technology -
> I know it's highly complicated, delicate, top precision work, and that the
> utmost time and care goes into testing such obvious configurations...err..uhh..
> wait a minute, what was I saying ???
>
> Jay Hennigan [jay at west.net] wrote:
>
>>Hello fellow Cisco-NSP folk.
>>
>>I have a brand new 2811 router which according to the Cisco DPRG
>>configurator is supposed to take the WIC-1DSU-T1-V2 modular WICs
>>as opposed to the non-V2 type.
>>
>>So we paid the higher price for brand-spanking-new V2 modules, and they
>>don't show up. "sho diag" gives:
>>
>> WIC Slot 0:
>> Unknown WAN daughter card
>> WIC module not supported/disabled in this slot
>> Hardware revision 64.0 Board revision >1
>> Serial number 1379991808 Part number 800-7441222-79
>> Test history 0x43 RMA number 48-55-51
>> Connector type PCI
>> EEPROM format version 1
>> EEPROM contents (hex):
>> 0x20: 01 80 40 00 52 41 01 00 C1 8B 46 4F 43 30 37 33
>> 0x30: 31 31 41 36 4A 82 49 20 9A 03 42 41 30 03 00 81
>>
>>Tried two different WICs in all slots with similar results.
>>
>>Is there some magic needed to get these recognized or do I have a hardware
>>issue? The box is running IP-Base 12.3(11)T2, same results with 12.3(8)T.
>>
>>--
>>Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Administration - jay at west.net
>>WestNet: Connecting you to the planet. 805 884-6323 WB6RDV
>>NetLojix Communications, Inc. - http://www.netlojix.com/
>>_______________________________________________
>>cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367
"Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list