[c-nsp] sup720 - is using 'mls rate-limit unicast cef receive' wise/recommended?

[Dale W. Carder]

On Jun 23, 2005, at 5:02 PM, Andrew Fort wrote:
> we found that 'mls rate-limit unicast cef receive' really helped the RP
...
> My question is, do other people use this?
...
>  is it just unnecessary to do this?).

For the 6500/7600 TME's lurking,
How does this solution compare to control plane policing
and selective packet discard?

Dale