[c-nsp] RE: cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 35, Issue 2
Vinod Joseph
VJoseph at bankdhofar.com
Sun Oct 2 08:11:43 EDT 2005
Hello Friends
I am running a VPN Concentrator 3005 with SSL and IPSEC tunnels inside (rel. 4.7) . Today we tried to configure one more user with priv. 15 but after that we are unable to see the administration and moniroing window either with Admin or with the new users . Unfortunately this config has been saved to the system. Whenever I tried to click on administration ( or monitoring) menu the following errors "You do not have sufficient authorization to access the specified page".
I think by mistake the some issues happend on the access-rights part. how to clear that off ?
Also another thing which i noticed is that, i am unable to console to my VPN box. I am using the same rollover cable which comes with Cisco routers. Is it the right one ? There is reset button at the back of the box.? What does it stands for ?By Any chance, is there an option to clear off the configs to factory defaults in VPN ?Do you think any other wayouts in this ?
Right now I am complete control on the configuration part . I can even add more WebVPn groups and users. The issues remains with me is of administration and monitoring part ..
thanks , Vinod Joseph
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of
cisco-nsp-request at puck.nether.net
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 8:01 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 35, Issue 2
Send cisco-nsp mailing list submissions to
cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cisco-nsp-request at puck.nether.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
cisco-nsp-owner at puck.nether.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-nsp digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Graphing traffic for specific BGP peer on exchange points
(Gert Doering)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 13:56:22 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Graphing traffic for specific BGP peer on
exchange points
To: Alexander Koch <efraim at clues.de>
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <20051001115622.GC1060 at greenie.muc.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 01:40:46PM +0200, Alexander Koch wrote:
> On Sat, 1 October 2005 13:37:19 +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> > Indeed. As I said, netflow could be used to get an approximation of
> > things, but "proper" MAC accounting would certainly be preferred.
>
> what about connecting your stuff on switches (hah, yes, on a
> 7600... <grin>) and do some sflow? i know public exchanges
> and switches are bad or so, but that will work out nicely.
> equinix does it, mix is doing sflow, linx is doing some stuff
> if i saw that correctly. sflow is a different vendor, but i
> would bet there is something on cisco that is similar. 7600
> is a switch, so does it just another angle and viewpoint and
> suddenly a feature is available?
Well, there *is* "bridged netflow" in SXE2 or SXF (need to look that up),
but I'm not sure whether you can use the routing engine inside the box
*and* use bridged netflow "from the port to the routing engine" to
get MAC accounting data...
Seems I need to read some docs and run some testing :-)
(OTOH, *if* the box can do this, it should be able to present the data
in "standard MAC accounting" format)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list
cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
End of cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 35, Issue 2
****************************************
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list