[c-nsp] MLPPP and ip load-sharing per-packet

[Rodney Dunn]

Very possible. Catching those spikes can be very difficult.

I've heard some things about this but I haven't found time
to do any research on it:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6558/products_white_paper0900aecd8024d42d.shtml

It sounds pretty interesting.

Rodney

On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 08:37:59AM -0400, Jon Lewis wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Oct 2005, Rodney Dunn wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 10:59:40AM -0400, Jon Lewis wrote:
> >> I recently converted a group of CEF T1s (ip load-sharing per-packet) to
> >> MLPPP, but forgot to remove the ip load-sharing per-packet from the
> >> individual T1s.  Does that command "do anything" when the circuits it's
> >> applied to are members of a multilink group?
> >
> > Nope. But please remove all commands from the member link T1's.
> 
> I suspected not, as it wouldn't make much sense, but we were still having 
> some issues with VOIP over the the Mu1 interface, so I did go ahead and 
> remove those.  I suppose it could be that we have brief traffic spikes 
> high enough that I either need more bandwidth or a service-policy giving 
> VOIP traffic preferential treatment over the Mu1.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Jon Lewis                   |  I route
>   Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
>   Atlantic Net                | 
> _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________