[c-nsp] RE: EIGRP and OSPF add-on

Brad Swanson lakepepin at hotmail.com
Tue Oct 11 09:49:08 EDT 2005


And I have this info as well:

“In link-state protocols you can not really filter an LSA with the 
distribute-list command. The LSA will still be in the database; however the 
LSA will not be installed in the routing table.”


>From: "Brad Swanson" <lakepepin at hotmail.com>
>To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>Subject: EIGRP and OSPF
>Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:47:06 -0500
>
>The overall config:
>
>Standard Cisco three tier design - core/dist/access.
>
>OSPF with three areas, but NO area 0.  OSPF is used for a very basic IBM 
>mainframe OSPF implementation.
>
>All IBM MF's land on the same L2 access swt with the OSPF happening at the 
>dist layer for ALL OSPF areas.
>
>All routes from OSPF are redist. into the network-wide routing protocol 
>EIGRP.
>
>What I want to be able to do is limit the routes learned from the MF's to 
>xxxx since I do not have control over the devices sending me routes.  Is 
>what I have below gonna get me where I want to be?  Again, I do not want 
>devices participating in OSPF NOT in their area to learn other routes from 
>other OSPF devices.  Do devices in area 112 have to go into EIGRP to get to 
>devices in area 122?
>
>router ospf 132
>log-adjacency-changes
>network 10.116.110.0 0.0.1.255 area 112
>network 10.116.120.0 0.0.1.255 area 122
>network 10.116.130.0 0.0.1.255 area 132
>default-information originate
>distribute-list 40 in
>
>access-list 40 deny   0.0.0.0
>access-list 40 permit any
>
>Thanks,
>Brad Swanson
>
>




More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list