[c-nsp] mpls-te - dynamic latency?

[christian.macnevin at uk.bnpparibas.com]

Hi folks,

We're just looking into mpls-te to ensure low latency paths are taken by 
the relevant traffic in our network,
We have an mpls core (sorry, I always have to make this disclaimer, 99% of 
people don't believe that any
financial would ever see the point) and will most likely be transitioning 
to is-is to make it happen.

Has anyone had any experience with doing this? I'm looking to use DS-TE 
and I'd really prefer to keep the 
tunnel building dynamic and avoid building hundreds of explicit tunnels. 
I'm guessing this might require 
weighting path selection for low and high latency paths based on igp 
tagging.


This message and any attachments (the "message") is 
intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. 
If you receive this message in error, please delete it and
immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with
its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole
or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet
can not guarantee the integrity of this message.
BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not
therefore be liable for the message if modified. 

**********************************************************************************************

BNP Paribas Private Bank London Branch is authorised
by CECEI & AMF and is regulated by the Financial Services
Authority for the conduct of its investment business in
the United Kingdom.

BNP Paribas Securities Services London Branch is authorised 
by CECEI & AMF and is regulated by the Financial Services 
Authority for the conduct of its investment business in 
the United Kingdom.
  
BNP Paribas Fund Services UK Limited is authorised and 
regulated by the Financial Services Authority