[c-nsp] PCF-PDSN

[Vikas Sharma]

Hi Alex,

It has been observed that the moment we define primary and Secondary PDSN at
PCF , it results in overlapping billing records for the subscriber.This is
because the algorithms / Logic implemented at PCF for declaring the Primary
PDSN as OSS and Redirecting the subsequent connections to the Secondary PDSN
is not full proof.
This results in data session on both the PDSN simultaneously and there by
Overlapping billing records.

Pls let me know if u need more info.


Regards
Vikas

Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:46:26 +0400
From: Alexander Serkin <als at cell.ru>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PCF-PDSN
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <443A53A2.1040104 at cell.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Hi, Vikas.

Vikas Sharma wrote:
> Hi Ronala,
>
> No, Ericsson and Motorola. Right now I am not concentrating on PDSN
> clustering. Through PCF I want to achieve geographical redundancy.
> Cisco PDSN support this feature of geographical redundancy.

If You have several PDSNs registered at PCF then when one of them comes
out of service PCF should take the next one.
And new packet data session should start on the next PDSN.
What do you mean by overlapping billing records?

>
> Regards
> Vikas Sharma
>