[c-nsp] NPE-400 vs. NPE-G1

[Aly, Yasser]

Hi Gert,

  Regarding using 6724 and a DFC, what would be the limitations using
6724 without DFC?

  DFC comes as optional, same as extra memory for the card.

Regards,
Yasser 

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Robert Blayzor
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 5:14 PM
To: Gert Doering
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NPE-400 vs. NPE-G1

Gert Doering wrote:
> If you need full line rate on more than one GE - for the price of two
> GE-PICs, you can get a 7603 with Sup720 and 10 ports GE, and run line
rate 
> on all of them.

For that application you wouldn't even need a 720, you could get a Sup32
and it comes with 8 gig-E ports (or two 10G), just add SFP's, and it's
save quite a bit less money vs the 720.

> While $J builds nice routers, the interface modules are just too
expensive
> if all you need is LAN cards.

This is the main reason why we went for 7606's with Sup720's over the
Juniper routers (I believe they were M20's).  I needed at least eight
Gig-E ports on both of them, so when I was presented with a quote for
basically 16 * $20,000 less 10-15% for just the Gig-E ports, my decision
was pretty easy. ;-)

The Gig-E ports on the Sup's will do full line rate, and if you start
exceeding things you can add a 6724 and a DFC, and you're still way
under the cost of the Junipers.

-- 
Robert Blayzor, BOFH
INOC, LLC
rblayzor\@(inoc.net|gmail.com)
PGP: 0x66F90BFC @ http://pgp.mit.edu
Key fingerprint = 6296 F715 038B 44C1 2720  292A 8580 500E 66F9 0BFC

Linux is Luke. FreeBSD is Yoda.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/