[c-nsp] ComCast
Jason Philbrook
jp at saucer.midcoast.com
Wed Jan 11 11:18:37 EST 2006
I don't see a problem (other than the UNI-P influence).
Higher cable prices means more opportunities and flexibility for other
forms of broadband to gain a foothold. You want the customers, but
really don't want to depend on their plant.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 01:55:08AM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> They probably finally got around to updating the switches on his
> segment..
>
> He's probably running Windows. He needs to get some real operating
> systems that obfuscate the IPid field. Good shoices are OpenBSD and
> FreeBSD. Some Solaris versions also do this to a certain extent.
>
> A paper on determining the NATTed hosts was published a few years
> ago here:
>
> http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb/papers/fnat.pdf
>
> See http://www.ntop.org for more info on how you access agents on
> switches that can do this.
>
> I frankly have zero sympathy for your employee and I doubt many
> people on this list do either. The cable providers are assholes who
> haven't let any other ISP's access to their network, and in fact it
> was lawsuits over them doing this that destroyed UNI-p last year and has
> made costs for a whole lot of people get a lot more expensive. Some
> clecs will probably go bank-o as a result of it. The more cable
> customers
> finally wise up to what assholes the cable providers are, and go back
> to the DSL providers, the happier I and a lot of people are gonna be.
>
> Merry Christmas from your cable provider. Oh by the way, before I
> forget to mention, tell your employee to use Vaseline before he
> bends over to get "serviced" by his cable provider - since they are
> going to stick it to him again for more money this year, see:
>
> http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051203/BIZ/512030371/
> 1001
>
> It will make it feel a bit better.
>
> Ted
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> >[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
> >Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 9:51 AM
> >To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >Subject: [c-nsp] ComCast
> >
> >
> >I have an employee that uses ComCast Cable and recently has run into a
> >little problem.
> >
> >
> >
> >He has ComCast High Speed Internet with a little FW. If he has one PC
> >no problem but if he plugs in a second PC it slows to a crawl. Both PC
> >work great individually either from the ComCast Cable or behind the FW.
> >He as also switched out Three different FWs. All have the same issue.
> >
> >
> >
> >He did some searching and he's not the only one having this issue.
> >
> >
> >
> >How is ComCast seeing weather they have one or more computers behind a
> >FW. The whole purpose of a FW is to hid everything.
> >
> >
> >
> >ComCast wants to sell him the home networking package to take care of
> >this. He didn't have this issue previous to Christmas.
> >
> >
> >
> >Any ideas?
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> >--
> >No virus found in this incoming message.
> >Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.16/225 - Release
> >Date: 1/9/2006
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
/*
Jason Philbrook | Midcoast Internet Solutions - Internet Access,
KB1IOJ | Hosting, and TCP-IP Networks for Midcoast Maine
http://f64.nu/ | http://www.midcoast.com/
*/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list