[c-nsp] cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 44, Issue 14

Jon Lewis jlewis at lewis.org
Thu Jul 6 17:29:12 EDT 2006


On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:

>> So if I understand correctly, the SUP32 is sufficient to
>> support the L3 features I require (OSPF, BGP, WCCP, VLANS,
>> MQC), and then I also need to select a card such as WS-X6148-
>> GE-TX  for the switch ports, which can also support an IP
>> address on the port for L3 point to point links right ?
>
> ACK.

There's also the lingering question I recently asked.  If you think you 
ever might want full BGP routes (I know you said you don't now), the Sup32 
may be an expensive, short lived piece of hardware.  Nobody seems to know 
if it'll ever support >256k routes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jon Lewis                   |  I route
  Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
  Atlantic Net                |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list