[c-nsp] cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 44, Issue 14
Jon Lewis
jlewis at lewis.org
Thu Jul 6 17:29:12 EDT 2006
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
>> So if I understand correctly, the SUP32 is sufficient to
>> support the L3 features I require (OSPF, BGP, WCCP, VLANS,
>> MQC), and then I also need to select a card such as WS-X6148-
>> GE-TX for the switch ports, which can also support an IP
>> address on the port for L3 point to point links right ?
>
> ACK.
There's also the lingering question I recently asked. If you think you
ever might want full BGP routes (I know you said you don't now), the Sup32
may be an expensive, short lived piece of hardware. Nobody seems to know
if it'll ever support >256k routes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis | I route
Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are
Atlantic Net |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list