[c-nsp] cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 44, Issue 14

[Arie Vayner]

If you really want to do full routes, go to Sup7203bxl. Still, many
(even maybe most) deployments do not require full routes.
Arie

On 7/7/06, Jon Lewis <jlewis at lewis.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
>
> >> So if I understand correctly, the SUP32 is sufficient to
> >> support the L3 features I require (OSPF, BGP, WCCP, VLANS,
> >> MQC), and then I also need to select a card such as WS-X6148-
> >> GE-TX  for the switch ports, which can also support an IP
> >> address on the port for L3 point to point links right ?
> >
> > ACK.
>
> There's also the lingering question I recently asked.  If you think you
> ever might want full BGP routes (I know you said you don't now), the Sup32
> may be an expensive, short lived piece of hardware.  Nobody seems to know
> if it'll ever support >256k routes.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Jon Lewis                   |  I route
>   Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
>   Atlantic Net                |
> _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>