[c-nsp] cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 44, Issue 14

[Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists]

> There's also the lingering question I recently asked.  If you 
> think you ever might want full BGP routes (I know you said you
> don't now), the Sup32 may be an expensive, short lived piece of
> hardware.  Nobody seems to know if it'll ever support >256k
> routes.

Well, with the current PFC3B it'll only support 239k. Cisco is
now saying "no plans" when asked about the PFC3BXL for Sup32.

I guess one can still hope for PFC3C(XL?).

-A