[c-nsp] policy routing on c4948
Alley Hasan
alley.hasan at netifice.com
Thu Jun 22 16:38:08 EDT 2006
Mark-
The 75% is due to a process.
Do a sh proc cpu | ex 0.00 and send the complete output.
Thanks
Alley
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Kent
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 12:28 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] policy routing on c4948
On a c4948-10GE(12.2(25)EWA),
I have a simple one-line access-list:
access-list 150 permit ip x.y.0.0 0.0.255.255 any
and a simple route-map:
route-map foo permit 10
match ip address 150
set ip default next-hop a.b.c.d
where IP address a.b.c.d is "directly connected, via Vlan55"
And I do this:
int vlan6
ip policy route-map foo
where vlan6 is pulling in about 44Mbs (8500pps).
This bumps the CPU from:
CPU utilization for five seconds: 10%/0%; one minute: 12%; five minutes:
11%
up to
CPU utilization for five seconds: 75%/2%; one minute: 60%; five minutes:
31%
Two questions:
a) I don't like the 75%, but since the second number is only 2%
should I worry about this?
b) Is there some other magic I can do to get this kind of policy
routing without bumping up the cpu so much?
I figured I should be able to get away with this simple example
without affecting the cpu much, and "sh int stats" does reveal that
the traffic is still hardware switched (as does, I'ld guess, the "2%").
Thanks,
-mark
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list