[c-nsp] Dynamic Routing over Tunnel (7507->1811w) ospf or eigrp

[Dave Temkin]

Is that 172.16.1.10 a valid next hop?


On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Skeeve Stevens wrote:

>
> 7507
>
> 6d19h: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Tunnel11, changed
> state to up
> 6d19h: is_up: 1 state: 4 sub state: 1 line: 0
> 6d19h: RT: add 10.11.6.0/24 via 172.16.1.10, eigrp metric [90/297246976]
> 6d19h: RT: add 10.11.0.0/24 via 172.16.1.10, eigrp metric [90/297246976]
> 6d19h: RT: add 10.11.2.0/24 via 172.16.1.10, eigrp metric [90/297246976]
> 6d19h: RT: add 10.11.1.0/24 via 172.16.1.10, eigrp metric [90/297246976]
> 6d19h: RT: add 10.11.81.0/24 via 172.16.1.10, eigrp metric [90/297246976]
> 6d19h: RT: add 10.11.82.0/24 via 172.16.1.10, eigrp metric [90/297246976]
> 6d19h: RT: add 10.11.83.0/24 via 172.16.1.10, eigrp metric [90/297246976]
> 6d19h: RT: add 10.11.84.0/24 via 172.16.1.10, eigrp metric [90/297246976]
> 6d19h: RT: add 10.11.85.0/24 via 172.16.1.10, eigrp metric [90/297246976]
> 6d19h: RT: add 10.11.86.0/24 via 172.16.1.10, eigrp metric [90/297246976]
> 6d19h: RT: add 10.11.7.0/24 via 172.16.1.10, eigrp metric [90/297246976]
> 6d19h: RT: add 10.11.3.0/24 via 172.16.1.10, eigrp metric [90/297246976]
> 6d19h: RT: add x.x.90.1/32 via 172.16.1.10, eigrp metric [90/297372416]
> 6d19h: RT: add x.x.91.0/24 via 172.16.1.10, eigrp metric [90/297246976]
> 6d19h: RT: add x.x.90.8/29 via 172.16.1.10, eigrp metric [90/297246976]
>
> Takes routes ok
>
> The 1811 just says
> *Mar  7 21:31:27.079: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 11: Neighbor 172.16.1.9
> (Tunnel11) is up: new adjacency
> *Mar  7 21:32:26.123: RT: NET-RED 0.0.0.0/0
> *Mar  7 21:33:26.123: RT: NET-RED 0.0.0.0/0
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Temkin [mailto:dave at ordinaryworld.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 March 2006 1:27 AM
> To: Skeeve Stevens
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Dynamic Routing over Tunnel (7507->1811w) ospf or eigrp
>
> Do a "debug ip routing" and flap the EIGRP or OSPF session and show us the
> output.
>
> Thanks,
> -Dave
>
>
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
>
> >
> > Hey guys
> >
> > 	I've spent 2 dozen hours trying to make this work and its driving me
>
> > nuts.
> >
> > 	I don't have the 'tunnel down to recursive routing' issue.. I got
> > past that.
> >
> > 	I have an up tunnel, which is all good. I have routes flowing from
> > the 1811 (small remote location) to the 7507 in either eigrp or ospf,
> > but no routing protocol will propagate into the 1811.  ospf or eigrp.
> >
> > 	When I was trying ospf, the routes were in the database on the 1811,
>
> > but not making it into the table. unsure why.
> >
> > 	Is there something I am missing here. because I am almost beat after
>
> > the amount of hours I have put on this.
> >
> > Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________
> > Skeeve Stevens, RHCE     Email: skeeve at skeeve.org
> > Website: www.skeeve.org  - Telephone: (0414) 753 383
> > Address: P.O Box 1035, Epping, NSW, 1710, Australia
> >
> > eIntellego - skeeve at eintellego.net - www.eintellego.net
> > _______________________________________________________
> > I'm a groove licked love child king of the verse Si vis pacem, para
> > bellum
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
>
> ========================================================================
>  iBurst Wireless Broadband from $34.95/month   www.platformnetworks.net
>  Forward undetected SPAM to:                   spam at mailsecurity.net.au
> ========================================================================
>