[c-nsp] iBGP questions
David Freedman
david.freedman at uk.clara.net
Mon Mar 20 13:38:30 EST 2006
> - Our current network is multihomed with a few upstream providers. Internally
> we run a meshed iBGP session between our core network devices. In the core we
> have two Catalyst switches that are trunked with each other (for VLAN
> purpose). Do we need to run iBGP session between them too?
>
You didn't say if these devices were core "switches" (i.e not used for
routing in the general scheme of things) or hybrid switch/routers
(running L3)
Do customers on the 1st Catalyst have connectivity at L3 to the rest of
the network via the 2nd Catalyst (and vice versa) ?
If you are passing traffic through a device at L3 on the way to anywhere
else in your network the other device will require some form of
reachability information, be it anything from a default route to a full
IP routing table (via iBGP).
If your devices are core routers and these core routers are supposed to
hold a full routing table then they will need to speak iBGP, preferably
directly to eachother (via a full mesh) to facilitate efficient update
distribution, but other designs are possible.
Its all dependant on your design, but generally this is the case.
Dave.
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list