[c-nsp] passive-interface missing from VRF routing processes?

Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboehmer at cisco.com
Fri Mar 31 14:18:28 EST 2006


Robert Blayzor <> wrote on Friday, March 31, 2006 8:27 PM:

> Using IOS 12.3(14)T5 I noticed that the "passsive-interface" directive
> is missing from OSPF processes designated to VRF's.
> 
> ie:
> 
> ar0(config)#router ospf 130 vrf foobar
> ar0(config-router)#pass?
> % Unrecognized command
> ar0(config-router)#pass
> 
> 
> On OSPF processes not related to a VRF instance, passive-interface
> exists as usual.  Digging through CCO I couldn't find anything on how
> or why it does not exist?  Anyone have any info?

passive-interface in vrf context is not available before 12.4(3) (see
CSCeb86068 for integration into other trains)

	oli



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list