[c-nsp] Feature request
Rodney Dunn
rodunn at cisco.com
Thu Nov 9 19:04:55 EST 2006
I agree.
I've never tested an OC192 running at high utilization and swing
the routing over from one path to the other on a transit link.
I wonder if you could reprogram the hardware fast enough to not
drop a *single* packet. :)
Rodney
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 07:18:39AM +1000, matt carter wrote:
> >
> > Disruptive means different things to different people.
> > If you define disruptive as losing a single packet it can't
> > be done today.
> >
>
> presuming we're talking scheduled work as mentioned i'd argue you could
> could can quite comfortable do this without a single packet drop simply by
> adjusting the metrics and resulting flow paths allowing you to effect a
> graceful removal of the device you are going do perform work on, before you
> do the work??? make before break, or have i got my wires crossed somehow..
>
> --matt
>
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list