[c-nsp] Bonding ADSL

[Paul Stewart]

thanks for the reply...

I'd be happy to share configs etc. - maybe the biggest thing I may have
missed with MLPPP is what should be configured on the 7206VXR to permit
MLPPP?  Or does anything need to be configured on the 7206VXR (l2tp
tunnels) to do it is perhaps the question....

When I did try it on the 1811, traffic would pass "partially" but then
stop working all together.... was kind of hoping someone had a "stock
config" they could share on this...

All the best,

Paul
 

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Lixfeld
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 2:11 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Bonding ADSL

I think MLPPP is a much better option than BGP (or any routing protocol,
for that matter) in this environment as bonding is what MLPPP was
designed for.  Perhaps working with the folks here to get your MLPPP
configuration working could be an idea.

On 19-Oct-06, at 2:02 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:

> This is an age old topic but I'm looking at bonding a pair of ADSL's 
> ...
>
> Setup is basically Cisco 1811 router (using dialer interfaces) across 
> two DSL links to same provider (we're the ISP) using two separate 
> usernames with two separate static IP addresses.  I'd like to 
> accomplish bonding or at least load balancing / redundancy if 
> possible.
>
> Suggestion has been to use BGP which I'm thinkig is a good solution.
>
> The DSL router on our side is a 7206VXR - originally I was going use 
> MLPPP but couldn't find a config that made it work properly... so BGP 
> is next best option...
>
> The 7206VXR does not run BGP today but I could set that up using iBGP 
> if neccessary.  What I'm thinking of is running multi-hop to our core 
> GSR box...
>
> Questions that come to mind are:
>
> Private AS or just run our own AS to the 1811?
> Can I only send partial table (our own network) to the 1811?
>
> I'm just trying to get my head around the best setup to use in this 
> scenario as it's not a common setup for us....
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/