[c-nsp] VRF-Lite Question

[Phil Mayers]

>> I can certainly vouch for running >350 heavyweight Cisco access
>> points being a tedious drain on resources.
> 
> Shouldn't be.  We mange 1,500+ AP's the same way we mange thousands
> of switches and routers, Rancid.

Typing into the CLI and keeping a record of old configs is so far down 
the list of my concerns I'd have to use scientific notation to assign it 
a score. It's a solved problem.

The problems we face are largely radio and mobility issues (power, 
coverage, channels, interference, roaming, location services).

Though frankly, even if the ONLY thing a lightweight solution did was 
free me from the alternatives of 600 extra subnets / 9 massive layer2s 
sprayed all around our core, I'd snap it up.