[c-nsp] L2 MPLS issue

[Rubens Kuhl Jr.]

I couldn't fully understand your setup, but I guess you could be
limited by the fact that EoMPLS only works on ports with "routerport",
not "switchport". You probably have to configure your switch to have
administration on a VLAN that is not default VLAN 1, and define a /30
to the segment connecting the switch to the PE and have the route to
that /30 propagated so you can access the switch. You can have one
subinterface with xconnect and another subinterface with IP routing.


Rubens




On 5/16/07, Hendry Sarumpaet <hsa at ntt.net.id> wrote:
>
>
> Hello all,
>
>      we currently deploying L2 mpls ethernet transport.
>      the simple design :
>
>
> CE -- (sw) -- PE1 --- P --- PE2 --- (sw) -- CE
>
>      VC  ID are showing up and both CE can communicate as expected.
>      however if we adding IP layer into another  sub-interface both on
>      PE1 and PE2 directed to Trunk Switch port we didn't able to communicated
>      with the IP it self( we need to access the switch for management
>      purpose).
>      Both PE1 and PE2 using 7206 with 12.4(4r)XD2 IOS, unfortunately
>      when replacing with 76 series with Version 12.2(18)SXF IOS both
>      L2 mpls transport and IP layer can work well into the different
>      ethernet sub interface.
>      Does anybody have any input regarding to this issue?
>      thanks a lot.
>
>
> --
> cheers
> hsa
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>