[c-nsp] Wanting to learn Juniper...

[Paul Cosgrove]

Of course we also have "no neighbor x.x.x.x peer-group MYPEERS", which 
rather than disassociating the neighbor from the peer group, will 
instead do the same as "no neighbor x.x.x.x".

Ben Steele wrote:
> That seems very intuitive to me, as soon as you understand that "no  
> xxxx" in IOS removes/negates "xxxx", means less commands which makes  
> sense.
> 
> Unless the term shutdown doesn't seem clear in an interface? I would  
> assume it does to the majority of people though, IOS familiar or not.
> 
> On 11/04/2008, at 3:43 PM, Jeremy Stretch wrote:
> 
>> Tolstykh, Andrew wrote:
>>> Cisco IOS is in fact extremely intuitive, there is nothing intuitive
>>> about the JunOS IMHO.
>> I can't speak on JunOS, but considering that the IOS command to enable
>> an interface is "no shutdown," IOS may not be as intuitive as you  
>> think.
>>
>> stretch
>> http://packetlife.net
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>