[c-nsp] 7201 rack mounting

Fred Reimer freimer at ctiusa.com
Wed Apr 23 14:42:39 EDT 2008


You have several things to consider before you start worrying about the 14
screws.  First is the shear force necessary to break the screws, and second
is the fact that a properly mounted chassis will result in the friction
between the mounting gear and the rack post taking up most of the weight and
considerably less weight being put on the screws.  It is even possible for
the screws to be under little or effectively no direct shear force.

I'm not a mechanical engineer, but I'm sure that Cisco did the proper
engineering to ensure sufficient screws if mounted properly.  The only
related case I'm aware of is a manufacturing defect where the side handles
on 6500 chassis would break off; I'm glad I'm not the one that called TAC
the day that was discovered!


Fred Reimer, CISSP, CCNP, CQS-VPN, CQS-ISS
Senior Network Engineer
Coleman Technologies, Inc.
954-298-1697


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Peter Rathlev
> Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 1:19 PM
> To: Dean Smith
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7201 rack mounting
> 
> Not really on topic, but we just finished mounting three 6509-V-E
> chassis; I know they come with some stub "shelves", but otherwise they
> just hang in seven 4 mm long screws in each side. (It doesn't matter
> how
> many rack mouting nuts you use, the panel you fasten to the rack is
> fastened to the chassis with those seven screws.)
> 
> The chassis itself weighs in at just below 50 kg. Add a supervisor and
> some heavy line cards and you're approaching my weight, and I'm not
> exactly lean. Fourteen tiny screws... I wouldn't rest in a hammock
> mounted in that way. :-)
> 
> Regards,
> Peter
> 
> On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 11:17 +0100, Dean Smith wrote:
> > Anyone else shocked at the appalling rack mounting supplied for 7201
> ?
> >
> > Single "ears" at either front or back is simply not good enough for
> >  that sort of box. Look at any 1U server (equivalent value/weight)
> and
> >  you'll get a decent adjustable rail that can go front to back and
> >  offer a proper stable mounting
> >
> > Our first 7201 install is drooping alarmingly (and I dont think its
> >  cheap rack rails)
> >
> > At cisco prices i dont expect to have to go and buy additional
> >  shelves/brackets just to get an acceptable rack mount solution !
> >  _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing
> >  list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at
> >  http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3080 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20080423/8fb20e5d/attachment.bin 


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list