[c-nsp] EoMPLS between 7600 & 7200 config clarification

[Phil Bedard]

That should be SRC, not SXC...

Phil


On Feb 5, 2008, at 4:41 PM, Phil Bedard wrote:

> I've setup port mode between a RSP720 SXC to a 6500 SUP720 SXH and  
> it worked fine.  The lack of VPLS support on the 6500/7600 without  
> an expensive upstream linecard is a huge oversight imho.
>
> Phil
>
>
> On Feb 5, 2008, at 4:05 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 21:48 +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 02:15:40PM -0600, Justin Shore wrote:
>>>> I'm in a similar boat as Jose.  What options for EoMPLS do we  
>>>> people
>>>> with 6700s have?  I'm trying physical to physical with no luck.
>>>
>>> physical to physical should work, according to the documentation.  I
>>> haven't tried it yet, though.
>>
>> Port mode (physical<->physical) works on 6500 SXF, not 7600 SXF (or
>> 12.2SR at all?) according to FN. Very strange, but one of the few
>> feature differences between 6500 and 7600 on SXF.
>>
>> We have EoMPLS Port Mode working fine on several 6500 SXF6 without
>> problems. Will try it on a pair of 7600 SRBs and post the results  
>> when I
>> get to it.
>>
>> First side note: EoMPLS Port Mode is really sweet, transparent to  
>> CDP,
>> STP and even UDLD. :-)
>>
>> Second side note: Does anyone maintain a FAQ for this list? Does  
>> anyone
>> have one lying around? Seems we could collect a lot of useful  
>> knowledge.
>> And pointing people to FAQs would probably educate them more than  
>> just
>> repeating everything. (Still waiting for that "mother of all  
>> FAQs"...)
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>