[c-nsp] GPON

[Mike Johnson]

What I meant about power i, is the advantage of using GPON to the desktop
a reduction in power because there are no access switches? The only problem
is
that now you need all of these cable modem type of devices at the desktop.
All this does
is to push the power requirement to the desktop and introduces a ton of new
devices to manage.

thanx for the link

harbor235 ;}

On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 7:42 AM, Andrey Oleinik <
Andrey_Oleinik at bms-consulting.com> wrote:

> Can U rephrase ur Q about power?
> Anyway try to dig here www.flexlight-networks.com
> IMHO this guys are leaders in GPON. If U're interesting I'll give U
> personal contact of FLN's human.
>
> --
> Respect,  Andy Oleynik
> Telecom Dpt Chief
> BMS Consulting Ltd
> 10, Stritenska Str., of. 520
> Kyiv, 01025, UA
> tel +380(44)4619961
> tel +380(44)4619963 extn 162
> fax +380(44)4619962
> www.bms-consulting.com
>
>
> andyo> -----Original Message-----
> andyo> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> andyo> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mike Johnson
> andyo> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 7:10 PM
> andyo> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> andyo> Subject: [c-nsp] GPON
> andyo>
> andyo> Does anybody have any GPON experience on the list?
> andyo>
> andyo> If so I am looking for Pros and Cons for implementing this for the
> andyo> CAN.
> andyo>
> andyo> Is there a power savings or the power requirement just pushed out
> andyo> to the
> andyo> desktop?
> andyo> hardware required to build a PON? OLTs, ONT/ONUs, splitters?
> andyo> How is GPON managed?
> andyo> Pice comparisons?
> andyo>
> andyo> Basically whatever info you have outside the classic definition,
> andyo>
> andyo> harbor235 ;}
> andyo> _______________________________________________
> andyo> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> andyo> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> andyo> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>