[c-nsp] 2621xm vs 1800?

[Paul Cosgrove]

Very much an upgrade judging from the following table. More than double 
the PPS & Mbps for Fast/CEF switched packets:-

http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf 


Would be interesting to know the cause of the issue though,

Paul.

Paul Stewart wrote:
> Hi there...
> 
> We have some remote sites with 2621XM's running today.  These routers are
> doing PPPOE termination primarily for 40-60 users.  The 2621XM is handling
> the load just fine however we've been having random problems with them
> lately and wanted to swap out the 2621XM for a different, more current model
> to see if the problem goes away (traffic just stops passing on the FE
> interfaces after a few weeks - tried multiple IOS versions - happening at
> several sites).
> 
> My question is whether or not an 1841 would be a downgrade or an upgrade for
> PPS and overall load?  Or should we just bite the bullet and get 2801's
> instead?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 


-- 
HEAnet Limited
Ireland's Education & Research Network
5 George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin 1, Ireland
Tel:  +353.1.6609040
Web:  http://www.heanet.ie
Company registered in Ireland: 275301

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.