[c-nsp] Recommended Cisco boxes for a small multihoming solution?

[a. rahman isnaini r.sutan]

IMHO, since we are now running both of Juniper & Cisco,  for handling 
huge of traffic (e.g Flooding) M5 still much better compared to 7206 VXR


a. r. isnaini rangkayo sutan

Rodney Dunn wrote:
> I haven't looked at the price list.
> 
> How does an ASR1002 compare to a G2 combo?
> 
>>From a growth perspective the ASR1002 would be what I would
> consider giving a potential migration to GigE.
> 
> Rodney
> 
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 08:52:47PM +0800, raymondh (NSP) wrote:
>> You may want to consider getting either part # CISCO7201 (PSU  
>> included) or 7206VXR/NPE-G2 (you need to pay for the PSU, it's quite  
>> cheap).
>> Both the part # for the box, shouldn't be much of a difference or same.
>>
>>
>> --raymondh
>>
>> On Nov 13, 2008, at 6:52 PM, Magnus Eriksson wrote:
>>
>>> I'm looking for some pointers on what are the smallest recommeded  
>>> Cisco
>>> boxes to use for a small multihoming solution.
>>>
>>> 2 full BGP views (approx 260k routes each)
>>> 100 Mbps bandwidth requirement.
>>>
>>> The setup currently uses 2 Juniper M5 but those are in dire need of  
>>> refresh.
>>>
>>>
>>> What is the appropiate Cisco boxes to go for? Do I need any memory  
>>> upgrades
>>> etc?
>>>
>>> Any suggestions are welcome.
>>>
>>> Regards Magnus
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> 
>