[c-nsp] Recommended Cisco boxes for a small multihoming solution?

[Mark Tinka]

On Friday 14 November 2008 11:36:41 a. rahman isnaini 
r.sutan wrote:

> IMHO, since we are now running both of Juniper & Cisco, 
> for handling huge of traffic (e.g Flooding) M5 still much
> better compared to 7206 VXR

To be fair, it's a different architecture - so an 
apple-to-apple comparison isn't really possible.

One should compare the entry-level M-series to Cisco's 
ASR1000 series, or the 7200's to Juniper's J-series.

Granted, Cisco have finally started playing ball in this 
hardware forwarding scope for this class of routers (as 
have Juniper in the software forwarding arena), so no 
operator can be blamed for past comparisons.

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20081114/2f21a70c/attachment.bin>