[c-nsp] looking for ideas on configuring HQos egress shaping on ES20G cards in 7600
Munroe, James (DSS/MAS)
James.Munroe at gnb.ca
Fri Oct 3 15:13:29 EDT 2008
Hello,
I'm looking for anyone who might have any recommendations from similar
setups they've done with H-Qos on ES20 linecards providing aggregate
shaping to remote sites made up of multiple VLANs.
Here's my scenario, looking to create H-Qos egress service policy on an
ES20G 1GE interface to shape multiple sub-interfaces as a single
aggregate shaper per site. Basically each site is a combination of
multiple assigned VLANs with a 1GE headend and the remotes are either 10
or 100Mbps accesses. For example:
interface GigabitEthernet8/0/1
description * Main Interface *
!
interface GigabitEthernet8/0/1.10
description * Site # 1 - VLAN 10 #
encapsulation dot1Q 10
ip vrf forwarding site1
ip address 10.1.10.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface GigabitEthernet8/0/1.11
description * Site # 1 - VLAN 11 #
encapsulation dot1Q 11
ip vrf forwarding site1
ip address 10.1.11.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface GigabitEthernet8/0/1.12
description * Site # 1 - VLAN 12 #
encapsulation dot1Q 12
ip vrf forwarding site1
ip address 10.1.12.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface GigabitEthernet8/0/1.20
description * Site # 2 - VLAN 20 #
encapsulation dot1Q 20
ip vrf forwarding site2
ip address 10.1.20.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface GigabitEthernet8/0/1.21
description * Site # 2 - VLAN 21 #
encapsulation dot1Q 11
ip vrf forwarding site2
!
interface GigabitEthernet8/0/1.22
description * Site # 2 - VLAN 22 #
encapsulation dot1Q 22
ip vrf forwarding site2
ip address 10.1.22.1 255.255.255.0
!
Site #1 is made up of VLAN 10,11,12 and Site #2 is made of VLAN
20,21,22. My goal is to apply a H-Qos service policy that shapes the
site VLAN groups to not exceed the access speed to the remote. VLANs
10-12 for site #1 would not exceed a combined shaper of 10Mbps where
VLANs 20-22 for site #2 would not exceed a combined shaper of 100Mbps.
The main interface Gi8/0/1 is a 1GE interface.
Any input or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Jim
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list