[c-nsp] GRE on Cat-4948 switch
Harald Firing Karlsen
maillist at thelan.no
Thu Jan 15 03:05:46 EST 2009
Justin Shore wrote:
> Ian MacKinnon wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Does anybody have any idea the impact of running multiple GRE tunnels
>> on a 4948 switch?
>>
>> I can see that it will be processed by software rather than hardware,
>> but just how much of a problem is this likely to be?
>>
>> I am only talking about a max of 100M of GRE traffic, amongst a
>> couple of Gig of total traffic.
Thats impossible to say without knowing what kind of traffic. If it's a
lot of small packets you will get a high PPS and thus a high overhead
which causes high CPU load. The 4948 might be able to do 100Mbit of
GRE-traffic under ideal conditions (only 1500B+ packets, etc), but
without knowing/controlling the traffic 100% it is very risky.
>
> I think one of the actual cisco.com guys would have to speak up to
> answer this question properly with figures on CPU speed, processing
> times, etc. I would say with an off-the-cuff figure is that process
> switching 100M would swamp most CPUs that Cisco has on the market.
> I'm fairly confident that our Sup720-3BXLs wouldn't take kindly to
> it. The experts would probably have a better answer for you though.
Well, the SUP720-3BXL does GRE in hardware, so pushing 100Mbit+ on a
SUP720-3BXL shouldn't be a problem.
--
Harald Firing Karlsen
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list