[c-nsp] VSS1440 to ASR1002 - MEC issues
Alasdair McWilliam
alasdairm at gmail.com
Fri May 1 11:29:56 EDT 2009
Hello,
I'm currently deploying two Cisco 6509-E chassis with VS-Sup720-10GE
(in a VSS 1440 cluster/configuration) with dual ASR 1002 routers to
provide aggregation of multiple upstream links (running multiple BGP
and EIGRP sessions).
I wanted to utilize MEC between each ASR and each 6509 chassis to
build in as much resilience as possible. However this configuration
seems to be playing up and so I thought I'd ask the experts!
Physical Topology:
ASR Gi0/0/0 into 6509 Chassis 1 Module 1 Port 1
ASR Gi0/1/0 into 6509 Chassis 2 Module 1 Port 1
The ASR is running IOS-XE 2.3.0 (IOS 12.2(33)XNC) AISK9 with dual IOS
processes.
The VSS chassis are running IOS 12.2(33)SXI1 ISK9 with a 4x 10GE VSL
(2 supervisor 10GE interfaces, 2 10GE interfaces on a 6708-10GE line
card).
I'm just using CAT6 between the ASR and the 6748-GE-TX line cards in
the VSS boxes.
ASR configuration:
interface Port-Channel1
ip address x.x.x.5 255.255.255.252
ip hello-interval eigrp 100 2
ip hold-time eigrp 100 6
ip authentication mode eigrp 100 md5
ip authentication key-chian eigrp 100 vcoresw1-chain
ip summary-address eigrp 100 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
no shut
!
interface Gi0/0/0
channel-group 1
no shut
interface Gi0/1/0
channel-group 1
no shut
Cisco VSS configuration:
int Gi1/1/1
no switchport
channel-group 3 mode on
int Gi2/1/1
no switchport
channel-group 3 mode on
int Po3
desc *** MEC to br1-po1 ***
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip vrf forwarding edge-vrf
ip address x.x.x.6 255.255.255.252
ip hello-interval eigrp 100 2
ip hold-time eigrp 100 6
ip authentication mode eigrp 100 md5
ip authentication key-chain eigrp 100 br1-chain
no shut
!
The problem I am experiencing seems to be one way traffic between the
VSS cluster and the Border Router. Pinging across this /30 subnet does
not work in either direction. EIGRP relationships build when the Po
interfaces first come online and then immediately time out moments
later. The VSS cluster then does not see any further EIGRP traffic
from the ASR. However the ASR seems to think it's successfully
building an adjacency to the VSS. However this times out due to 'retry
limit exceeded' every minute or so, but seems to think it re-
establishes again.
This problem persists if we drop the PortChannel to just one Gigabit
Ethernet interface. The second interface can be shut down or actually
removed from the Po config (eg. no channel-group 1).
The really interesting thing is, with one link, if we remove the
channel-group comand from the one remaining ASR interface, all of a
sudden the link springs to life. Pings between the ASR Gi0/0/0
interface and the Po3 VSS interface are successful. EIGRP relationship
comes up immediately and is stable, and routes are exchanged as you'd
expect.
How does this work? With the ASR thinking it's a non-etherchannel
interface, but the VSS thinking it IS an EtherChannel (with 1 member),
surely it should just fail?
Am I doing something wrong or could this be a bug in either VSS or the
ASR?
It's not earth shattering, we could just configure 2 EIGRP sessions
between the VSS and the ASR (4 in total with 2 ASRs) but don't think
this is as clean an implementation as MEC across fully redundant
chassis and line cards (one of the big selling points of the VSS !!)
Any help would be much appreciated!
Thanks
Alasdair
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list