[c-nsp] Cat7600/Sup720 and IPv4 vs IPv6 performance

Gert Doering gert at greenie.muc.de
Fri May 8 05:30:57 EDT 2009


On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 09:54:40AM +0200, Lukasz Bromirski wrote:
> But the BU is already focused on adding services, not extending routing
> capabilities.

I never understood why people always think you need to "extend routing
capabilities" on a box that perfectly well does whatever it needs to
do :-)

The BU split is a reason to by ASR1k, I agree on that.


USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 304 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20090508/5aa7acff/attachment-0001.bin>

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list