[c-nsp] SUP720 IDB Limit

Stephen Kratzer kratzers at ctinetworks.com
Fri May 8 22:47:30 EDT 2009

On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 21:28 +0200, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
> On 2009-05-08 21:18, Stephen Kratzer wrote:
> > The ASR is certainly a better choice, but cost is an overriding factor. Does
> > anything in particular makes the 7600 a poor choice aside from the existence
> > of better alternatives? Thanks.
> Define what you're doing currently on the 7200. If you expect to
> do MQC-style shaping per user on WS-X6[12357]xx LCs then you're
> unfortunately wrong - You'd need SIPs or ES20/40s to do the job.
> What else?

Not doing anything too special. L2TP, VPDN, PPPoE, OSPF, netflow. No
per-session shaping or policing. Does the 7600 family lack anything that
the 7200 series has?


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list