[c-nsp] network rebuild questions

Jon Lewis jlewis at lewis.org
Sat Oct 31 15:43:00 EDT 2009


On Sat, 31 Oct 2009, Bill Desjardins wrote:

> well, sup1 6500's doing everything all in one have been rock solid the
> last 5+yrs now and are still pushing ~460k PPS in+out at this very
> moment without a hiccup and doing everything I want them too. its 99%
> voip traffic as well with very happy customers. I dont see the point

Funny...I was going to ask if your traffic was mostly VOIP or 
something...because the PPS rate seemed awfully high for the bit rate.

You mentioned full routes on Sup1's.  I didn't think that was possible. 
If your planned upgrade is just to Sup2's, you might have a look at 
http://jonsblog.lewis.org/2008/01/19#bgp

The prefix-list is somewhat outdated now, but the beauty of its design is 
that which it doesn't know about, it permits down to /24, so all you lose 
is some route filtering.

Contrary to what Roland may think, the 6500 is a popular box for data 
centers / ISPs doing all ethernet.  It may be lacking in things like uRPF 
and netflow, but for line-rate capability packet forwarding and the 
ability to shrug off DDoS's aimed across it, it's kind of the sweet spot 
in price/performance.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jon Lewis                   |  I route
  Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
  Atlantic Net                |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list