[c-nsp] 12.2(18)SXD to 12.2(33)SRB|C|D

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday 15 September 2009 04:39:53 am Richard A 
Steenbergen wrote:

> Personally my recommendation for going forward is SRC
> (SRC4 is pretty stable, all things considered).

Would also recommend SRC; we have it largely deployed on a 
number of 7200's.

SRC4 is stable, but a few issues, that will be resolved in 
SRC5, hound us. Nothing major, probably not faced by many 
others...

Point is, SRC is probably a more mature release.

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20090915/077ce12c/attachment.bin>