[c-nsp] Problem with Cisco 4900M and SFP-H10GB-CU1M-G cable

Tony Varriale tvarriale at comcast.net
Thu Dec 30 20:44:34 EST 2010


And the SFP rev?

tv
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jose Madrid 
  To: Tony Varriale 
  Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
  Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 1:43 PM
  Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Problem with Cisco 4900M and SFP-H10GB-CU1M-G cable


  I upgraded the device to 12.2(54)SG.  


  On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Tony Varriale <tvarriale at comcast.net> wrote:


    ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jose Madrid" <jmadrid2 at gmail.com>
    To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
    Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 12:08 PM
    Subject: [c-nsp] Problem with Cisco 4900M and SFP-H10GB-CU1M-G cable




      I have a Cisco 4900M with the OneX adapter module (CVR-X2-SFP10G).  I am
      trying to use a generic twinax cable (SFP-H10GB-CU1M-G) and am getting
      errors.  I was hoping someone on this list could point me in the right
      direction on solving this issue.  What I am getting is the following:
      " %C4K_GLMMAN-3-NONSFPPLUSINONEXCONVERTERHOLE: Non-SFP+ inserted in port
      Te1/2 ( 1 ), which is for 10G SFP+ OneX Converter."  Seems pretty
      self-explanatory except that the vendor has told me that it is indeed an
      SFP+ module.  I have tried service unsupported-transceiver and still
      nothing.  Any ideas?

      -- 
      It has to start somewhere, it has to start sometime.  What better place than
      here? What better time than now?




    I assume the G on your SPF part number was just a typo.

    Assuming the OneX is good, if I had to guess code on 4900M?  What rev you running?

    Or, the rev on the SPF.

    tv 
    _______________________________________________
    cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
    https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
    archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/




  -- 
  It has to start somewhere, it has to start sometime.  What better place than here? What better time than now?


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list